Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
startrek
13 Beiträge 6 Kommentatoren 1 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

    All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

    • TOS: What if people in the future didn't suck?
    • TNG: What if people in the future didn't suck but in HD?
    • DS9: Terrorism is good actually, because fascism is bad
    • VOY: Oops! DS9 got too political! Star Wars and sexy robot lady, anyone?
    • ENT: Rick Berman's George-Lucas-complex fails / men will write 9/11 fanfic instead of going to therapy huh
    • DIS: We love Mass Effect btw
    • SNW: Paramount said remake TOS but worse
    • LWD: Do you like Rick & Morty? Do you confuse fan service for humour? Do we have a ship to sell you!
    • PRO: Can kids be merchandised to? Guess not, better cancel it
    • PIC: We wanted to make Blade Runner 3 but Ridley Scott said no :c
    • S31: We could tell you how much the CIA is paying us for this, but we'd have to kill you

    #StarTrek

    c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
    c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
    c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #2

    @amberage where’s Lower Decks fit?

    amberage@eldritch.cafeA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io

      @amberage where’s Lower Decks fit?

      amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
      amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
      amberage@eldritch.cafe
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #3

      @c0dec0dec0de for one sweet, blissful moment, I forgot it existed…

      c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

        @c0dec0dec0de for one sweet, blissful moment, I forgot it existed…

        c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
        c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
        c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #4

        @amberage

        amberage@eldritch.cafeA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io

          @amberage

          amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
          amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
          amberage@eldritch.cafe
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #5

          @c0dec0dec0de the sad thing about LWD is: it's the closest to good Trek we have at the moment.

          It looks like TNG ten years down the road. There are no nonsensical aesthetic retcons, no holo interfaces, no spore drive, no "we ran out of ideas so we're doing the Borg again", no "Blade Runner but worse".

          It could be so, so good, and in an alternate dimension, somewhere far far away, where they have good Star Trek, there is a version of me enjoying LWD as a lovely Star Trek self-parody.

          But in this dimension, the fact that the show with the most potential to be authentic Star Trek is not just a comedy, but a comedy that's canon, ridiculous plots and tiringly self-referential fan service gags included, feels like salt into wounds.

          amberage@eldritch.cafeA c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
          0
          • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

            @c0dec0dec0de the sad thing about LWD is: it's the closest to good Trek we have at the moment.

            It looks like TNG ten years down the road. There are no nonsensical aesthetic retcons, no holo interfaces, no spore drive, no "we ran out of ideas so we're doing the Borg again", no "Blade Runner but worse".

            It could be so, so good, and in an alternate dimension, somewhere far far away, where they have good Star Trek, there is a version of me enjoying LWD as a lovely Star Trek self-parody.

            But in this dimension, the fact that the show with the most potential to be authentic Star Trek is not just a comedy, but a comedy that's canon, ridiculous plots and tiringly self-referential fan service gags included, feels like salt into wounds.

            amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
            amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
            amberage@eldritch.cafe
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #6

            @c0dec0dec0de (same issue I have with PRO: it could be a lovely Star Trek kids' show, but that it and its kindergarten-level plots are considered canon is awful IMO)

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

              @c0dec0dec0de the sad thing about LWD is: it's the closest to good Trek we have at the moment.

              It looks like TNG ten years down the road. There are no nonsensical aesthetic retcons, no holo interfaces, no spore drive, no "we ran out of ideas so we're doing the Borg again", no "Blade Runner but worse".

              It could be so, so good, and in an alternate dimension, somewhere far far away, where they have good Star Trek, there is a version of me enjoying LWD as a lovely Star Trek self-parody.

              But in this dimension, the fact that the show with the most potential to be authentic Star Trek is not just a comedy, but a comedy that's canon, ridiculous plots and tiringly self-referential fan service gags included, feels like salt into wounds.

              c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
              c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
              c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #7

              @amberage I thought it wasn’t canon, although the runners and writers went to pains to make sure nothing contradicted actual canon?

              amberage@eldritch.cafeA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

                All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

                • TOS: What if people in the future didn't suck?
                • TNG: What if people in the future didn't suck but in HD?
                • DS9: Terrorism is good actually, because fascism is bad
                • VOY: Oops! DS9 got too political! Star Wars and sexy robot lady, anyone?
                • ENT: Rick Berman's George-Lucas-complex fails / men will write 9/11 fanfic instead of going to therapy huh
                • DIS: We love Mass Effect btw
                • SNW: Paramount said remake TOS but worse
                • LWD: Do you like Rick & Morty? Do you confuse fan service for humour? Do we have a ship to sell you!
                • PRO: Can kids be merchandised to? Guess not, better cancel it
                • PIC: We wanted to make Blade Runner 3 but Ridley Scott said no :c
                • S31: We could tell you how much the CIA is paying us for this, but we'd have to kill you

                #StarTrek

                jbear5@floofy.techJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jbear5@floofy.techJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jbear5@floofy.tech
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #8

                @amberage Oh, is that why they canceled Prodigy

                amberage@eldritch.cafeA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io

                  @amberage I thought it wasn’t canon, although the runners and writers went to pains to make sure nothing contradicted actual canon?

                  amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  amberage@eldritch.cafe
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #9

                  @c0dec0dec0de the wiki considers it canon, and in general, the approach from both Paramount and fans has always been that anything that's in an official movie or show is canon ("alpha canon"), whereas tie-in books, games, comics, etc. aren't ("beta canon")

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • jbear5@floofy.techJ jbear5@floofy.tech

                    @amberage Oh, is that why they canceled Prodigy

                    amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    amberage@eldritch.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    amberage@eldritch.cafe
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #10

                    @Jbear5 no idea tbh

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

                      All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

                      • TOS: What if people in the future didn't suck?
                      • TNG: What if people in the future didn't suck but in HD?
                      • DS9: Terrorism is good actually, because fascism is bad
                      • VOY: Oops! DS9 got too political! Star Wars and sexy robot lady, anyone?
                      • ENT: Rick Berman's George-Lucas-complex fails / men will write 9/11 fanfic instead of going to therapy huh
                      • DIS: We love Mass Effect btw
                      • SNW: Paramount said remake TOS but worse
                      • LWD: Do you like Rick & Morty? Do you confuse fan service for humour? Do we have a ship to sell you!
                      • PRO: Can kids be merchandised to? Guess not, better cancel it
                      • PIC: We wanted to make Blade Runner 3 but Ridley Scott said no :c
                      • S31: We could tell you how much the CIA is paying us for this, but we'd have to kill you

                      #StarTrek

                      lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #11

                      @amberage honestly, I love lower decks. The fan-service is a bit much sometimes, but it's my type of humour

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

                        All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

                        • TOS: What if people in the future didn't suck?
                        • TNG: What if people in the future didn't suck but in HD?
                        • DS9: Terrorism is good actually, because fascism is bad
                        • VOY: Oops! DS9 got too political! Star Wars and sexy robot lady, anyone?
                        • ENT: Rick Berman's George-Lucas-complex fails / men will write 9/11 fanfic instead of going to therapy huh
                        • DIS: We love Mass Effect btw
                        • SNW: Paramount said remake TOS but worse
                        • LWD: Do you like Rick & Morty? Do you confuse fan service for humour? Do we have a ship to sell you!
                        • PRO: Can kids be merchandised to? Guess not, better cancel it
                        • PIC: We wanted to make Blade Runner 3 but Ridley Scott said no :c
                        • S31: We could tell you how much the CIA is paying us for this, but we'd have to kill you

                        #StarTrek

                        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        researchfairy@scholar.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #12

                        @amberage My non-ironic, considered theory is that someone at CBS saw Logan (2017) and they were like "I could do that, but make it Star Trek" and they had exactly zero more ideas and that's where Star Trek: Picard came from

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • amberage@eldritch.cafeA amberage@eldritch.cafe

                          All Star Trek shows in a nutshell:

                          • TOS: What if people in the future didn't suck?
                          • TNG: What if people in the future didn't suck but in HD?
                          • DS9: Terrorism is good actually, because fascism is bad
                          • VOY: Oops! DS9 got too political! Star Wars and sexy robot lady, anyone?
                          • ENT: Rick Berman's George-Lucas-complex fails / men will write 9/11 fanfic instead of going to therapy huh
                          • DIS: We love Mass Effect btw
                          • SNW: Paramount said remake TOS but worse
                          • LWD: Do you like Rick & Morty? Do you confuse fan service for humour? Do we have a ship to sell you!
                          • PRO: Can kids be merchandised to? Guess not, better cancel it
                          • PIC: We wanted to make Blade Runner 3 but Ridley Scott said no :c
                          • S31: We could tell you how much the CIA is paying us for this, but we'd have to kill you

                          #StarTrek

                          mina@berlin.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mina@berlin.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mina@berlin.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #13

                          @amberage

                          So accurate!

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • mina@berlin.socialM mina@berlin.social shared this topic
                          Antworten
                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                          • Älteste zuerst
                          • Neuste zuerst
                          • Meiste Stimmen



                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                          • Anmelden

                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                          • Erster Beitrag
                            Letzter Beitrag
                          0
                          • Home
                          • Aktuell
                          • Tags
                          • Über dieses Forum