Mastodon Skip to content
  • Home
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Über dieses Forum
Einklappen
Grafik mit zwei überlappenden Sprechblasen, eine grün und eine lila.
Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

Kostenlos. Werbefrei. Menschlich. Dein Abnehmforum.

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting.

No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
175 Beiträge 67 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH hellomiakoda@pdx.social

    @mattblaze I don't have the legal authority to drive 75 in a 60 mph zone, but if nobody writes the ticket, I get away with it.

    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.social
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #32

    @hellomiakoda but if your car can’t go 75, you can’t do itnin the first place. And there is simply no mechanism through which a US president can nationalize US elections, which are run by state and local governments.

    hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      @diasyy11 My point is what I said it was: Trump, for the reasons I mentioned, simply has no legal or practical ability to nationalize US elections.

      cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
      cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
      cryptadamist@universeodon.com
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #33

      @mattblaze @diasyy11 he may have no legal way to do it but that's never stopped him before...

      as far as practical ability, i mean he now has a private army that answers to no one but himself called ICE that's larger and better funded than the marine corps... so i don't think it's correct to say he has no practical ability any more.

      mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mattblaze@federate.social
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #34

        @diasyy11 If you think Trump can nationalize US elections, please explain how that would work.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

          @hellomiakoda but if your car can’t go 75, you can’t do itnin the first place. And there is simply no mechanism through which a US president can nationalize US elections, which are run by state and local governments.

          hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          hellomiakoda@pdx.social
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #35

          @mattblaze Yep, just like he can't bom random ass fisherman without congressional approval. How's that working out?

          oclsc@mstdn.caO M 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
          0
          • cryptadamist@universeodon.comC cryptadamist@universeodon.com

            @mattblaze @diasyy11 he may have no legal way to do it but that's never stopped him before...

            as far as practical ability, i mean he now has a private army that answers to no one but himself called ICE that's larger and better funded than the marine corps... so i don't think it's correct to say he has no practical ability any more.

            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mattblaze@federate.social
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #36

            @cryptadamist @diasyy11 you’re the elections expert.

            cryptadamist@universeodon.comC mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

              @cryptadamist @diasyy11 you’re the elections expert.

              cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
              cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
              cryptadamist@universeodon.com
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #37

              @mattblaze @diasyy11 i don't have to be an elections expert to understand that if a bunch of guys with guns show up and start beating people up and shutting down the polling station or seizing the machines, that nothing in the law can stop that and in a situation like minneapolis where the cops are outnumbered 5:1 by ICE guys with bigger guns, nothing in local law enforcement can stop it either.

              mattblaze@federate.socialM oclsc@mstdn.caO angry_drunk@union.placeA 3 Antworten Letzte Antwort
              0
              • cryptadamist@universeodon.comC cryptadamist@universeodon.com

                @mattblaze @diasyy11 i don't have to be an elections expert to understand that if a bunch of guys with guns show up and start beating people up and shutting down the polling station or seizing the machines, that nothing in the law can stop that and in a situation like minneapolis where the cops are outnumbered 5:1 by ICE guys with bigger guns, nothing in local law enforcement can stop it either.

                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mattblaze@federate.social
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #38

                @cryptadamist @diasyy11 Again, feel free to freak out about this complete nothingburger if it makes you feel better. No skin off my nose.

                cryptadamist@universeodon.comC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                  @cryptadamist @diasyy11 Again, feel free to freak out about this complete nothingburger if it makes you feel better. No skin off my nose.

                  cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cryptadamist@universeodon.com
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #39

                  @mattblaze @diasyy11 i'm not freaking out about it and i don't think it's particularly likely but at the same time i think completely ruling it out from a guy who sent his followers to their deaths with lies on january 6th just bc he couldn't handle losing power is foolish.

                  cryptadamist@universeodon.comC 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • cryptadamist@universeodon.comC cryptadamist@universeodon.com

                    @mattblaze @diasyy11 i'm not freaking out about it and i don't think it's particularly likely but at the same time i think completely ruling it out from a guy who sent his followers to their deaths with lies on january 6th just bc he couldn't handle losing power is foolish.

                    cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cryptadamist@universeodon.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cryptadamist@universeodon.com
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #40

                    @mattblaze @diasyy11 p.s. the last thing i heard him say wasn't that he needed to nationalize elections, but that he thought they will need to commandeer the election machinery in just 15 places that he deems problematic. that was a few hours ago.

                    15 places is well within ICE's budget.

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.social
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #41

                      @diasyy11 @cryptadamist I’m just a law professor and computer scientist who studies US elections for a living. You can value my perspective or not. Your choice; I’ll be fine either way.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.social
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #42

                        @diasyy11 @cryptadamist I actually know a thing or two about how elections work. I’m not going to apologize for being an actual expert on this subject.

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.social
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #43

                          @diasyy11 @cryptadamist I’m fine with the cushy jobs that currently have. I have no political ambitions.

                          inquiline@assemblag.esI 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                            @cryptadamist @diasyy11 you’re the elections expert.

                            mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mihamarkic@mastodon.social
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #44

                            @mattblaze @cryptadamist @diasyy11 You are assuming the law still works as intended, which might not be the case anymore. But after all the Epstein files and a failure to punish attempted coup on previous term (to name just two examples), can we still say that law actually works? I think people here are concerned that the Orange will bypass the law through force, not that he can do it legally. 🤷‍♂️

                            mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • mihamarkic@mastodon.socialM mihamarkic@mastodon.social

                              @mattblaze @cryptadamist @diasyy11 You are assuming the law still works as intended, which might not be the case anymore. But after all the Epstein files and a failure to punish attempted coup on previous term (to name just two examples), can we still say that law actually works? I think people here are concerned that the Orange will bypass the law through force, not that he can do it legally. 🤷‍♂️

                              mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mattblaze@federate.social
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #45

                              @mihamarkic @cryptadamist @diasyy11 you’re the expert.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                I could go into detail about what the limits on executive and federal control over US elections are, and what the president could do to exert influence over them, but it would be extremely tedious and irrelevant to the actual reality here, which is that this is a nothing burger.

                                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mattblaze@federate.social
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #46

                                Scale of US elections:

                                51 states (and DC), each with its own election laws

                                Most ballot questions are for state and local offices and initiatives

                                ~ 5000 local election administration jurisdictions (mostly counties and townships), which run election logistics

                                ~ 115,000 local polling places, mostly borrowed for election day

                                ~ 750,000 election day workers

                                ~ 138,000,000 ballots cast in 2016, 82,000,000 of which at local polling places on election day.

                                mattblaze@federate.socialM cartyboston@mastodon.roundpond.netC amenonsen@mastodon.socialA tstudent@infosec.exchangeT rainer@socialbc.caR 5 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                  @diasyy11 @cryptadamist I’m fine with the cushy jobs that currently have. I have no political ambitions.

                                  inquiline@assemblag.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  inquiline@assemblag.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  inquiline@assemblag.es
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #47

                                  @mattblaze

                                  hi, longtime follower of yours, the daisy account joined a day or two ago and is engagement farming (if that is the right word), not even sincerely if annoyingly arguing. "her" handful of interactions are replying to a couple/few big accts including yours

                                  oblomov@sociale.networkO me_valentijn@m.ai6yr.orgM 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                    @diasyy11 My point is what I said it was: Trump, for the reasons I mentioned, simply has no legal or practical ability to nationalize US elections.

                                    tknarr@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tknarr@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tknarr@mstdn.social
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #48

                                    @mattblaze @diasyy11 Save for the fact that that won't necessarily stop him, enough GOP state governments would go along to make it successful, and he'll appeal any TROs or PIs to the Supreme Court with the risk they'll overturn those TROs/PIs on the shadow docket regardless of logic or lack thereof (look at all the otherwise completely non-controversial TROs/PIs they've done that with in the last year).

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                      @dominykas It’s like asking why he can’t suspend laws of thermodynamics or declare himself to be eight feet tall. It’s simply not a thing he controls.

                                      atm0spheric@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      atm0spheric@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      atm0spheric@mastodon.social
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #49

                                      @mattblaze @dominykas

                                      Before the laws of thermodynamics we had folklore.

                                      You can't put the genie back in the bottle but Trump can decimate it's followers with his threats.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                        Scale of US elections:

                                        51 states (and DC), each with its own election laws

                                        Most ballot questions are for state and local offices and initiatives

                                        ~ 5000 local election administration jurisdictions (mostly counties and townships), which run election logistics

                                        ~ 115,000 local polling places, mostly borrowed for election day

                                        ~ 750,000 election day workers

                                        ~ 138,000,000 ballots cast in 2016, 82,000,000 of which at local polling places on election day.

                                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mattblaze@federate.social
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #50

                                        It’s hard to overstate just how huge this system is, or how many moving parts are involved. And almost all of it operates at the local level, governed by state laws and local practices and tied to the structure of local government.

                                        This is not something you can just snap your fingers and take over by fiat or force, not to mention the fact that it’s all deeply embedded in federal and state constitutional structures.

                                        runrichrun@mastodon.socialR mattblaze@federate.socialM btaroli@federate.socialB don@me.dmD phredmoyer@hachyderm.ioP 5 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                          No, Trump does not have the legal authority or the practical ability to “nationalize” US elections, for all the same reasons he also didn’t when he issued an executive order a few months ago abolishing mail in voting. Elections are governed by states, and, to a limited extent, Congress. Not the executive branch.

                                          There are plenty of very real, immediate threats to democracy to get worked up about right now. This isn’t one of them.

                                          sikorsky78@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sikorsky78@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sikorsky78@infosec.exchange
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #51

                                          @mattblaze Ok so nationalizing by decree is out. What are the election dangers we/the US people should be worrying about?

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen



                                          Copyright (c) 2025 abSpecktrum (@abspecklog@fedimonster.de)

                                          Erstellt mit Schlaflosigkeit, Kaffee, Brokkoli & ♥

                                          Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Nutzungsbedingungen

                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Du hast noch kein Konto? Registrieren

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Home
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Über dieses Forum