"In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show."

zlabe@fediscience.org

"In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show." https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/climate/trump-epa-air-pollution.html

bakerrl75@m.ai6yr.org

@ZLabe Palm slap to forehead, violent head shake…

gezza@mastodon.ie

@ZLabe
If you consider human lives as worthless, then that makes perfect sense. Now who can I think of that has made it clear how much value they put on (everyone else's) human life?

peterfisherbooks@disabled.social

@ZLabe after our government's environmental quislings get done making our planet uninhabitable they must plan on working remotely from another dimension. lol share the inter-dimensional travel tech you wankers.

drgroftehauge@sigmoid.social

@ZLabe So neither the cost of cleaning up their pollution nor the cost of the damage the pollution causes? What's left?

finitum@mastodon.social

@ZLabe Monetary Value Protection Agency.
So, so stupid.

kplklink@mastodon.social

@ZLabe Their reality isn’t mine. The Twilight Zone maybe?

energisch_@troet.cafe

Dieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!

Abspeckgeflüster – Forum für Menschen mit Gewicht(ung)

"In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show."