I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement.
-
@urlyman I was in BlueSky for a while too…. but it’s too political, and also quite discriminative of single fathers. If you have NO political opinion there, you’re a nobody, who nobody trusts. You’re considered a “red flag” if you don’t support the left. Other platforms consider you a “red flag “ if you don’t support the right.
I love the Fediverse! It gives the finger to both.
@el_coyote I made hundreds of posts of different kinds. Probably the majority were weighted towards the political. Got next to nothing back either way
️ -
@urlyman Really? That's interesting, as I'm trying out Mastodon and coming from Bluesky, I interact with people frequently there. Yet, I only have 20-something followers, none of whom know me IRL.
@mycos maybe I was unlucky. What I was saying was no different than my schtick here. The difference in conversational exchange was stark
-
@urlyman My favorite part of Mastodon is that there are very few incentives for doing whatever it takes to build an audience. You kind of just put your circle together and that's it. Just like we wanted.
-
@urlyman I often post the same thing there and here and get no one responding to me there
@blp that was my experience too
-
@urlyman It looks to me like BS is the place to "build an audience", to perform as a big account, and to overhear conversations between "important" people. People doing single issue advocacy seem to get more of what they're personally looking for there. And they likely make more of an impact there than they would here.
I'm not looking for an audience, the big account path looks like a bad life to lead, and I'm not important. I do like chatting with people. This place is a good fit for me.
@colo_lee same
-
@urlyman 100% agree! My experience is on Twitter not Bluesky, but I quickly learned that follower counts don't matter much on the fedi. The higher (good faith) engagement is far more satisfying than a number going up, and you don't need to be a big account to attract that.
It's also great to see how even many big accounts here have adjusted to the different vibe, and aren't snooty about talking to those with low follower counts. Prominent figures are willing to be more generous with their time.
@ApostateEnglishman I too have noticed that adjustment
-
I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement. If you’re a somebody, the platform laps it up.
But on Mastodon the conversation flows irrespective of who you are.
I know where I’d rather be https://fediscience.org/@kathhayhoe/116065653289142235
@urlyman can 100% confirm and yes me too
#lovesfedi -
@urlyman It looks to me like BS is the place to "build an audience", to perform as a big account, and to overhear conversations between "important" people. People doing single issue advocacy seem to get more of what they're personally looking for there. And they likely make more of an impact there than they would here.
I'm not looking for an audience, the big account path looks like a bad life to lead, and I'm not important. I do like chatting with people. This place is a good fit for me.
-
@fruitcakesareyum I see you
And fruitcakes are my favourite kind of cake
Thanks!
-
@wavesculptor heh!
Katharine does vital work and I’m happy that she finds BlueSky to be a place for it
@urlyman Maybe less of an echo-chamber too.
-
I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement. If you’re a somebody, the platform laps it up.
But on Mastodon the conversation flows irrespective of who you are.
I know where I’d rather be https://fediscience.org/@kathhayhoe/116065653289142235
@urlyman Yeah Bsky just reeks of the same ol’ “look at me and how many followers I have!”
-
E elbekai@norden.social shared this topic
